East Africa News

With land privatization and fencing of thousands of hectares of communal grazing areas, East Africa is struggling with one of the most radical cultural and environmental changes in its history, accordig to a recent study.

The 668,500-hectare Greater Mara is of crucial importance for the great migrations of large mammals and for Maasai pastoralist culture. However, the magnitude and pace of these fencing processes in this area are almost completely unknown.

The study, published by the US National Center for Biotechnology Information, provides new evidence that fencing is appropriating land in this area at an unprecedented and accelerating speed and scale.

Using mapped series of multi-spectral satellite imagery, researchers found that in the conservancies with the most fences, areal cover of fenced areas has increased by more than 20 per cent since 2010.

“This has resulted in a situation where fencing is rapidly increasing across the Greater Mara, threatening to lead to the collapse of the entire ecosystem in the near future. Our results suggest that fencing is currently instantiating itself as a new permanent self-reinforcing process and is about to reach a critical point after which it is likely to amplify at an even quicker pace, incompatible with the region’s role in the great wildebeest migration, wildlife generally, as well as traditional Maasai pastoralism,” the study notes.

The Greater Mara is a 668,500-hectare large area in southwestern Kenya. Masai Mara refers to a gazetted national reserve managed by the Narok County Government situated within this area. The remaining Greater Mara comprises smaller administrative areas, including wildlife conservancies, conservation areas and settlement areas.

A wildlife conservancy describes land set aside by an individual landowner, body corporate, group of owners or a community for purposes of wildlife conservation in accordance with the provisions of the Wildlife Conservation and Management Act in Masai Mara.

The whole report is published here: NCBI

 

 

Add a comment

By Michael Schwartz

My colleague Moses Konde and I were in Kidepo Valley National Park last year, hoping to film an elephant migration for the National Geographic Society.

We were heading down a long dirt track near the border of South Sudan in search of a bachelor herd, when suddenly we spotted a lone lioness hunched over a small pool of rainwater. She was a relatively old girl, judging from her charcoal-black nose and gaunt face, not to mention the noticeable ribs that ran along her underside.

Finished drinking, she headed over to a termite mound to lie down, ignoring our presence in regal fashion. As she stared off in the direction of the border, I knew that if she dared cross over, she’d either be shot or snared by Sudanese poachers, or perhaps poisoned by pastoralists defending their cattle.

I mouthed a silent prayer to myself, hoping that she’d stay in the park where it was safe. But lions are as much opportunists as they are hunters. Bottom line, they often target the easiest meals, and at that lioness’s ripe old age, a small goat or a slow-moving cow would be far easier pickings than an angry buffalo.

There are a decent number of lions in Kidepo, all living in and around a park that’s flanked along the border by poachers, poisons and snares. It’s a harsh world for people and lions, I recall thinking to myself. A beautiful, terrifyingly harsh world.

I decided to return to the Pearl of Africa in early 2017 to learn more about how the lesser known population of Africa’s largest of big cats were faring.

Uganda boasts a small but stable number of lions—roughly 350 of them. Apart from only one reportedly living in Lake Mburo National Park, most reside in the country’s largest protected area, Murchison Falls National Park, the tourist-favoured Queen Elizabeth National Park and Kidepo Valley National Park, a pristine, largely unknown wilderness in the far north of the country.

I decided to check out Queen Elizabeth National Park, a 1,978 square kilometre wildlife sanctuary in western Uganda hosting about 70 lions, most of which are closely monitored by a small team of dedicated conservationists from the Uganda Carnivore Program (UCP).

Led by Dr. Ludwig Siefert, a German wildlife veterinarian and conservationist, and with assistance from California’s Oakland Zoo and the Disney Conservation Fund, UCP engages in carnivore (lions, leopards and hyaenas) research and conservation, which includes implementing a variety of community-based efforts, primarily designed to mitigate human-wildlife conflict.

“Conflict with humans is the biggest threat for lions here,” Siefert explained, referring to situations where lions and other predators encounter local people and their livestock, both outside and within Uganda’s national parks.

“Whereas Queen Elizabeth’s lions will sometimes venture into human territory, especially along the Kasese boundary in the north and Lake Katwe in the west, pastoralist communities occasionally bring their cattle into the park to graze, which can lead to livestock depredation.”

Queen Elizabeth is also home to roughly 30,000 people, some of whom live in 11 enclave villages scattered throughout the park, making human-wildlife conflict the biggest challenge for conserving its lions.

Human-wildlife conflict involving lions sometimes results in deadly retaliation by people. Some of the worst years were between 2006 and 2012, when an estimated 36 living in the northern sector were poisoned, representing just under 50 percent of known lion deaths in the area within that period. Other causes of death included being shot, getting killed by fearful mobs or accidents with oncoming vehicles.

Such anthropogenic threats have impacted the social size of Queen Elizabeth’s prides, meaning that instead of upwards of 20 lions—the average size of a standard pride in East Africa—a Ugandan pride typically consists of smaller maternal groups spread out over a wider area with dominant male coalitions controlling multiple maternal groups at a time.

Consequently, some areas of Queen Elizabeth National Park now only contain single mother lionesses that have all but lost the benefits of feline sociality they would otherwise enjoy. As it stands, there are a grand total of just 28 breeding lions out of the estimated 54 living in the northern sector of the park.

Siefert took me to see one of the largest group of lions, located in Queen Elizabeth’s northeast region of Kasenyi, consisting of two male coalitions (five lions) overlapping with two maternal groups.

Matriarch, Lena, and her sister, Bridget, lead a maternal group totalling around 12 felines. We happened upon them near a grove of candelabra euphorbia trees, all looking well rested after having recently fed on a warthog and buffalo calf.

“He’s going to climb up,” Siefert said clairvoyantly as one of the juveniles walked past us toward a candelabra where several other lions were sleeping. Seconds later, the young male launched himself up the spiny sides, seemingly to get a better view of us.

“There’s more over there,” Siefert added, pointing toward some nearby thorn bushes. As I let my eyes adjust, the outlines of several big cats inside the dense thicket began to take shape. One of them was Bridget, an old, but queenly looking lioness with a cataract developing over her left eye.

Both she and Lena had certainly seen plenty of action, evidenced by the visible scars around their faces. But the group is thriving in spite of the hardships, thanks to the continued efforts of Siefert and the UCP team, who purchase lights for village cattle enclosures, construct safe corrals and even assist in human-wildlife conflict education efforts at local primary and secondary schools.

It dawned on me that UCP is on the front lines of an ongoing battle, their goal not only to save Uganda’s lions and other predator species from extinction, but also to help improve the quality of life for people.

“Lions are an integral part of Uganda,” Siefert said. “Conserving them starts with talking to communities, offsetting human-wildlife conflict and helping meet the basic needs of local people and integrating them into the tourism market.”

As I watched Bridget sitting quietly in the shade, I was reminded of the lone lioness I saw in Kidepo Valley National Park one year earlier, realizing that the challenges that Queen Elizabeth’s lions are facing are but a mere microcosm for every lion remaining in the Pearl of Africa.

I remember standing just over the border in neighboring South Sudan in the fading light of evening, the setting sun coating the escarpment in brilliant, fiery tones, while the sky cast a somber, bluish hue over the valley. There I stood, hoping, praying that that old lioness didn’t cross the border.

“OK, let’s be off,” our ranger ordered, presumably concerned about armed poachers who typically conduct their clandestine affairs after dark.

I took one last look, the soaring plateau and thorny savanna unfolding toward a majestic horizon in the cool of early evening.

It’s a bittersweet place—one I’m unashamed to admit that I will never fully understand; where sunlight and dust bathe the terrain in dazzling colors; where roaring lions and impoverished communities both struggle to survive; and where poachers, poison and snares lie in wait.

To learn more about how you can help Uganda’s lions, leopards and hyaenas please visit http://www.uganda-carnivores.org

Add a comment

Kenya’s National Environmental Tribunal on Thursday issued an order halting the construction of the second phase of the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) between Nairobi and Naivasha as it considers whether a proper environmental impact assessment was carried out ahead of the project’s implementation, the Standard online website reported.

“It is clear when there is an appeal to the tribunal concerning environmental issues, the status quo is maintained until the dispute is determined,” the tribunal’s ruling stated. “Thus, this is to direct that all activities relating to construction of Phase 2A of the SGR be stopped until the appeal is determined.”

Construction of the railway is being challenged by Kenya Coalition for Wildlife Conservation and Management and activist Okiya Omtatah. The lobby has argued that the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) irregularly awarded Kenya Railways Corporation an environment impact assessment license allowing it to proceed with the project.

The petitioners maintain that the licence was hurriedly issued in controversial circumstances and without consultations with institutions responsible for wildlife and environment conservation.

“The report the licence is based upon has serious flaws, including being inconsistent with the legal framework governing environment protection. It assumes other agencies will supervise the construction when the contract is exclusively given to a foreign entity,” said the conservation lobby.

Conservationists, including the East African Wildlife Society, have been particularly critical of the decision to route the railway through the Nairobi National Park, which they said ignored the railroad’s effect of wildlife.

Add a comment

Twitter Feeds

Subscribe to our News

 

Sign up now to receive exciting and insightful conservation news delivered directly to your inbox.

Click Here to subscribe and access our past newsletter archive